Hester v. United States

1924 United States Supreme Court case
Hester v. United States
Argued April 24, 1924
Decided May 5, 1924
Full case nameHester v. United States
Citations265 U.S. 57 (more)
44 S. Ct. 445; 68 L. Ed. 898; 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2577
Holding
"The special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their 'persons, houses, papers and effects', is not extended to the open fields."
Court membership
Chief Justice
William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Edward T. Sanford
Case opinion
MajorityHolmes, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which established the open-fields doctrine.[1] In an opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Court held that "the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their 'persons, houses, papers and effects', is not extended to the open fields."[2]

See also

References

  1. ^ Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57-59 (1924).
  2. ^ Hester, 265 U.S. at 59.

Further reading

  • Edward G. Mascolo, The Role of Abandonment in the Law of Search and Seizure: An Application of Misdirected Emphasis, 20 Buff. L. Rev. 399 (1970).

External links

  • Text of Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924) is available from: CourtListener  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  OpenJurist 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Scope of the Fourth Amendment
Definition of search
Open-fields doctrine
Aerial surveillance
Third-party doctrine
Definition of seizure
Fourth Amendment standing
Warrant requirement
Mere evidence rule
Neutral and detached magistrate
Warrants directed at third parties
Knock-and-announce
Exigent circumstances
Consent searches
Plain view
Vehicle searches
Searches incident to arrest
Breathalyzers, blood samples, DNA
Protective sweeps
Inventory searches
Border searches
Checkpoints
Students, employees, and patients
Property of probationers and parolees
Administrative inspections
Searches in jails and prisons
Warrantless arrests
Seizures
Distinguishing stops and arrests
Seizure of premises awaiting warrant
Detention incident to search
Detention during vehicle stop
Excessive force
Remedies
Exclusionary rule
Origins
Impeachment exception
Good-faith exception
Independent source
Inevitable discovery
Attenuation
No-knock searches
Habeas corpus review
Civil suit
Federal
State
Incorporation against States
Unreasonable search and seizure
Warrant requirements


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e