Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

2009 United States Supreme Court case
Gross v. FBL Financial Services
Argued March 31, 2009
Decided June 18, 2009
Full case nameJack Gross, Petitioner v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
Docket no.08-441
Citations557 U.S. 167 (more)
129 S. Ct. 2343; 174 L. Ed. 2d 119
Holding
A plaintiff must prove, by preponderance of evidence, that age was the "but for" cause of the adverse employment action.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityThomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito
DissentStevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
DissentBreyer, joined by Souter, Ginsburg
Laws applied
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e-2

Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2009, involving the standard of proof required for a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Jack Gross, an employee of FBL Financial Services, Inc., was transferred to another position and a former subordinate took on many of Gross' old responsibilities. They both received the same compensation, but Gross believed his reassignment was a demotion. Gross brought suit against FBL in April 2004 in District Court, claiming ADEA violations. The court found in his favor and awarded him $5,000,000 in lost compensation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the decision. The Supreme Court affirmed that reversal, finding that a plaintiff must prove by preponderance of evidence, that age was the "but for" cause of the adverse employment action.

References

  • Keep Young and Beautiful โ€” Especially At Work

External links

  • Text of Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009) is available from: Cornell  Justia  Oyez (oral argument audio)  Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived) 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Intentional Torts
Assault & Battery
Abuse of process
intentional infliction of emotional distress
Trespass to land & Trespass to chattels
Conversion
Privacy, Publicity rights
Tortious interference
Defamation
Negligence
Duty of care
Medical malpractice
Wrongful death, Loss of consortium
Common employment
Public Authority, Fireman's rule, Negligence per se
Causation
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
Nuisance
Public
Private
Strict liability
Ultrahazardous activity
Product liability
Damages
Joint and several liability
Comparative negligence
Punitive damages


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e