Counterinduction
In logic, counterinduction is the practice of elaborating a paradigm that contradicts and helps to question the current one by comparison. Paul Feyerabend argued for counterinduction as a way to test unchallenged scientific theories; unchallenged simply because there are no structures within the scientific paradigm to challenge itself (See Crotty, 1998 p. 39). For instance, Feyerabend is quoted as saying the following:
"Therefore, the first step in our criticism of customary concepts and customary reactions is to step outside the circle and either to invent a new conceptual system, for example, a new theory, that clashes with the most carefully established observational results and confounds the most plausible theoretical principles, or to import such a system from the outside science, from religion, from mythology, from the ideas of incompetents, or the ramblings of madmen." (Feyerabend, 1993, pp. 52-3)
This gets into the pluralistic methodology that Feyerabend espouses that will help support counterinductive methods. Paul Feyerabend's anarchist theory popularized the notion of counterinduction.
Most of the time when counterinduction is mentioned, it is not presented as a valid rule. Instead, it is given as a refutation of Max Black's proposed inductive justification of induction, since the counterinductive justification of counterinduction[jargon] is formally identical to the inductive justification of induction.[1] For further information, see Problem of induction.
See also
- A priori and a posteriori – Two types of knowledge, justification, or argument
- Abductive reasoning – Inference seeking the simplest and most likely explanation
- Bayesian inference – Method of statistical inference
- Hasty generalization – Conclusion made on the basis of one or few instances of a phenomenonPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
- Justified true belief – Proposed definitions of knowledgePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
- Law of large numbers – Averages of repeated trials converge to the expected value
- Solomonoff's theory of inductive inference – mathematical formalization of Occam's razor that, assuming the world is generated by a computer program, the most likely one is the shortest, using Bayesian inferencePages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
References
- ^ The Problem of Induction Archived March 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- v
- t
- e
- Thomas Aquinas
- Augustine of Hippo
- William Alston
- Robert Audi
- A. J. Ayer
- George Berkeley
- Laurence BonJour
- Gilles Deleuze
- Keith DeRose
- René Descartes
- John Dewey
- Fred Dretske
- Edmund Gettier
- Alvin Goldman
- Nelson Goodman
- Paul Grice
- Anil Gupta
- Susan Haack
- David Hume
- Immanuel Kant
- Søren Kierkegaard
- Peter Klein
- Saul Kripke
- Hilary Kornblith
- David Lewis
- John Locke
- G. E. Moore
- John McDowell
- Robert Nozick
- Alvin Plantinga
- Plato
- Duncan Pritchard
- James Pryor
- Hilary Putnam
- W. V. O. Quine
- Thomas Reid
- Bertrand Russell
- Gilbert Ryle
- Wilfrid Sellars
- Susanna Siegel
- Ernest Sosa
- P. F. Strawson
- Baruch Spinoza
- Timothy Williamson
- Ludwig Wittgenstein
- Nicholas Wolterstorff
- Vienna Circle
- more...
- Coherentism
- Constructivism
- Contextualism
- Empiricism
- Evolutionary epistemology
- Fallibilism
- Feminist epistemology
- Fideism
- Foundationalism
- Holism
- Infinitism
- Innatism
- Naïve realism
- Naturalized epistemology
- Phenomenalism
- Positivism
- Rationalism
- Reductionism
- Reliabilism
- Representational realism
- Skepticism
- Transcendental idealism
- A priori knowledge
- A posteriori knowledge
- Analysis
- Analytic–synthetic distinction
- Belief
- Common sense
- Descriptive knowledge
- Exploratory thought
- Epistemic injustice
- Epistemic virtue
- Gettier problem
- Induction
- Internalism and externalism
- Justification
- Knowledge
- Objectivity
- Privileged access
- Problem of induction
- Problem of other minds
- Perception
- Procedural knowledge
- Proposition
- Regress argument
- Simplicity
- Truth
- more...
- Category
- Task Force
- Stubs
- Discussion
This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e