Counterinduction

In logic, counterinduction is the practice of elaborating a paradigm that contradicts and helps to question the current one by comparison. Paul Feyerabend argued for counterinduction as a way to test unchallenged scientific theories; unchallenged simply because there are no structures within the scientific paradigm to challenge itself (See Crotty, 1998 p. 39). For instance, Feyerabend is quoted as saying the following:

"Therefore, the first step in our criticism of customary concepts and customary reactions is to step outside the circle and either to invent a new conceptual system, for example, a new theory, that clashes with the most carefully established observational results and confounds the most plausible theoretical principles, or to import such a system from the outside science, from religion, from mythology, from the ideas of incompetents, or the ramblings of madmen." (Feyerabend, 1993, pp. 52-3)

This gets into the pluralistic methodology that Feyerabend espouses that will help support counterinductive methods. Paul Feyerabend's anarchist theory popularized the notion of counterinduction.

Most of the time when counterinduction is mentioned, it is not presented as a valid rule. Instead, it is given as a refutation of Max Black's proposed inductive justification of induction, since the counterinductive justification of counterinduction[jargon] is formally identical to the inductive justification of induction.[1] For further information, see Problem of induction.

See also

  • A priori and a posteriori – Two types of knowledge, justification, or argument
  • Abductive reasoning – Inference seeking the simplest and most likely explanation
  • Bayesian inference – Method of statistical inference
  • Hasty generalization – Conclusion made on the basis of one or few instances of a phenomenonPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
  • Justified true belief – Proposed definitions of knowledgePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
  • Law of large numbers – Averages of repeated trials converge to the expected value
  • Solomonoff's theory of inductive inference – mathematical formalization of Occam's razor that, assuming the world is generated by a computer program, the most likely one is the shortest, using Bayesian inferencePages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback

References

  1. ^ The Problem of Induction Archived March 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  • v
  • t
  • e
Epistemology
EpistemologistsTheoriesConceptsRelated articles
  • Category
  • Task Force
  • Stubs
  • Discussion
  • v
  • t
  • e
Concepts
Theories
Philosophy of...
Related topics
Philosophers of science
Precursors
  • Category
  • Philosophy portal
  • icon Science portal
    • v
    • t
    • e
    Perspectives
    Declinations
    Principal concepts
    Antitheses
    Related paradigm shifts
    in the history of science
    Related topics
    Method
    Contributions
    Proponents
    Criticism
    Critics
    Concepts in contention
    Category
    Stub icon

    This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

    • v
    • t
    • e